The system one village one product (OVOP) in the agribusiness field began to be developed in Kab. Garut. This matter aimed at increasing the level kesejahtaraan the farmer by applying the pattern of the management that was continuous with the concept that put the potential for the area forward.“consep that was carried by OVOP that is developing the original potential for the area to be able to compete in the global level. Therefore, was needed by the policy platform of the government that took sides to petani,” said Chairman of the International Cooperative Development Fund Training (ICDF) Dr Asep Saefudin".
According to him, the potential size for the area that was owned the area must be matched by the pattern of the policy that took sides with the farmer. He demonstrated the existence of the firmness of the government to pressure the businessman's side or the modern market both the local and foreign businessman who arbitrarily slowed down payment to the farmer.
this caused a clear loss to the farmer's side, because now most uptil capital that was operational was ROLLED money went the farmer, as a result not the rare farmer who was stopping because of his money was not paid yet. Really, there was the farmer that complain about him slow payment by the modern market through to the sending to 20 or 22. This was significant, the farmer that subsidize entrepreneurs, "smoke words.
The OVOP concept must be as efforts to increase its competence, matched with Segmentation of the market. If not, capital and technology that were spent will be thrown away was in vain. "OVOP could cultivate local product competitiveness. Only, the market opportunity for the segment of the product that was produced from the local expertise must also pitch the accommodation so that not futile, "
According to him, the potential size for the area that was owned the area must be matched by the pattern of the policy that took sides with the farmer. He demonstrated the existence of the firmness of the government to pressure the businessman's side or the modern market both the local and foreign businessman who arbitrarily slowed down payment to the farmer.
this caused a clear loss to the farmer's side, because now most uptil capital that was operational was ROLLED money went the farmer, as a result not the rare farmer who was stopping because of his money was not paid yet. Really, there was the farmer that complain about him slow payment by the modern market through to the sending to 20 or 22. This was significant, the farmer that subsidize entrepreneurs, "smoke words.
The OVOP concept must be as efforts to increase its competence, matched with Segmentation of the market. If not, capital and technology that were spent will be thrown away was in vain. "OVOP could cultivate local product competitiveness. Only, the market opportunity for the segment of the product that was produced from the local expertise must also pitch the accommodation so that not futile, "
posted by Anonymous at
8:33 AM Thursday, May 28, 2009
